Monday, February 15, 2010
Math Applet Review #2
Math Applet Review #1
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Rubrics at Play by McGatha and Darcy - MTMS
Classroom Characters Coach Students to Success -Edwards
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Review of Two PBLs
PBL: ADOPT-A-LOT
Summary
The PBL called “Adopt-a-lot” is a about a school that was given a piece of land and $35,000. The 5th grade class had to design a park that met the needs of the community. They are given the $35,000 to go towards the building of the park, but once they exceeded that amount they would have to decide how to fundraise. Throughout the PBL, the students will create and explain graphs, and surveys used to collect data about the environment. They would also gain experience of creating, prioritizing, and distributing a budget. Students will solve problems involving scale factors. Students will have to recognize and apply mathematics in situation outside of the mathematics classroom.
Strengths and Weaknesses
A strong point of the PBL was overall design of the PBL. This PBL did a great job on the overall design. The grade level given for the math being done was not appropriate, but it was organized well. A weakness was that the math level being used by students was not aligned with the grade level given for the PBL.. The work that the students would complete was at a 3rd grade level. The overview of the PBL stated that it was designed for 5th and 6th graders.
Appropriate Grade Level?
This PBL did not have the appropriate grade level listed. The PBL was supposed to be used in a 5th or 6th grade classroom. The work that was asked of the students was at around the 3rd grade level.
Assessment
The assessment of the math content and process was very vague. The rubric that was given gave too much slack in each point value. It allowed too much leniency.
PBL: LOUNGING AROUND
This PBL is for 8th grade students where the students must design an addition to the school that will house more space for the 8th grade because of the dramatic increase in the class population. The students will build on data analysis and probability, geometry, number and operations, algebra, and measurement. This PBL will take place over 22 days.
A strength of this PBL is how the objectives are presented in the daily plan and on the objectives page. One the objectives page, it was nice to have them organized by content areas. Having the objectives for each individual day plan was nice. It is important to have the specific objectives that should be reach that day stated directly on the page. A weakness of the PBL is how the daily plan is organized. Having to read through an entire paragraph to find information can be tedious. Using bullet points for the Daily plan is more effective. It is easier to find specific information when it is formatted as individual bullet points. Another weakness is that there was no PBL web. The group did not create a web for the PBL. The work had a weak overall format of the work. There was not an organized overview of the important points of the PBL. Listing grade level, duration, rationale, math focus, and higher level thinking in a list form, it allows the teacher to quickly see the important points.
The focus of the PBL is half on math, and half on other subject areas. The math that is required by the students is repeated very often throughout the PBL. Students are not building on skills constantly, but they are just using the same ones more often.
The assessment rubrics were not detailed enough. They left a lot of room for students to question what each grade required. Some of the areas being assessed on the rubrics repeat.
Compare and Contrast the 2 PBLS
These two PBL’s contrasted regarding the appropriate grade level given to it. The first PBL was not appropriate for the grade level stated, but the second PBL was. Both PBL’s had great organization, although one had a more organized overall layout of the PBL, and the other had better organization of the objectives. Both PBL groups had weak assessments. Both groups need to improve their rubrics.